Breaking news
South Africa stripped of their 2023 Rugby World Cup title…U.S. women’s national soccer team starts World Cup with 3-0…Pakistan vs Jordan 0-3: FIFA World Cup 2026 qualifier –…World Cup 2023-24 prize money: How much did Mikaela Shiffrin…T20 World Cup 2024: England star Ben Stokes pulls out…Former Michigan football tight end selects transfer destination – Yahoo…Egypt’s Late Goal Denies Mozambique’s Thrilling Comeback in the African…Ghana Suffers Heartbreaking 1-2 Defeat to Cape Verde Islands in…FIFA and Coca-Cola Men World RankingLionel Messi wins football’s Ballon d’Or for the eighth timeTwo individuals tragically lost their lives before the scheduled football…WORLD CUP QUALIFIERS: Brazil’s Coach Diniz Praises Neymar and Vinicius.Morocco, Portugal and Spain joint bid FIFA World Cup 2030The Best 2023: Over One Million Votes Cast with the…Euro 2028 to be hosted by Britain and Ireland, while…Portugal secures their inaugural World Cup victoryPreview of the 2023 ICC Cricket World Cup Match: India…Welteji and Kessler achieved world record breaking performancesAsian Games 2023: Gilas Pilipinas win first men’s basketball gold Cricket World Cup 2023: Pakistan beat NetherlandsPakistan vs Afghanistan15 ways to make the most of your new cameraKenya’s Harambee Stars climb six places in latest FIFA rankings…Local soccer player receives life saving transplant – ABC 10…GeoGuessr World Cup Grand Finals 2024 Shows Just How Little…Man Falsely Accused Fantasy Football Rival of Plotting Mass Shooting…Preview: Lakewood vs. Compton, Football – The562.org

Playing a Dangerous Game? Human Rights Risks Linked to the 2030 and 2034 FIFA World Cups – Amnesty International USA

Sheet of paper Report
June 5, 2024
The choice of which countries host the FIFA Men’s World Cup is one of the most significant decisions that football’s global governing body can make. Hundreds of thousands of workers will be involved in delivering each tournament, over a million fans will travel across borders to watch matches, billions more will watch it on TV or online, and enormous sums will be spent on major infrastructure projects. Host countries will gain huge visibility and prestige, while FIFA’s earnings will be vast –projected to reach over US$11 billion from the next World Cup in 2026.
History shows that the World Cup can be a source of dignity or exploitation, inclusion or discrimination, freedom or repression. FIFA’s choice of host for the 2030- and 2034-men’s World Cups is therefore both hugely consequential and already controversial. For 2030, FIFA is considering just one bid – jointly by Morocco, Portugal and Spain – with three matches to be played in Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. For 2034, only a bid from Saudi Arabia is on the table. One tournament held over three continents, and another in a country with few human rights protections, is set to test FIFA’s human rights commitments to the limit.
This report brings together analysis from human rights organizations, trade unions and fans’ representatives – including from members of the Sport and Rights Alliance – as well as UN experts, treaty monitoring bodies, government data and media reports. It aims to highlight key risks connected to the hosting of the two World Cups that must be addressed if FIFA and bidding countries are to
prevent human rights violations during their preparation and delivery.
Join us and build a world where human rights are enjoyed by all.

Follow Us
AmnestyUSA
© 2024 Amnesty International USA

source

Share this post

PinIt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

scroll to top