Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.
Americas+1 212 318 2000
EMEA+44 20 7330 7500
Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000
Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.
Americas+1 212 318 2000
EMEA+44 20 7330 7500
Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000
The European Court of Justice’s recent decision in Diarra v. FIFA, a case involving former soccer player Lassana Diarra, could reshape the future of soccer transfers by expanding on principles established by a previous court ruling. It also opens the door to a more player-centric model for the soccer transfer market.
The Diarra ruling indicates a preference for prioritizing players’ rights, allowing them to leave contracts early and join new clubs without facing the severe financial consequences that have traditionally accompanied such moves. This gives athletes more control over their careers. The concept of players as independent workers with the freedom to pursue new opportunities could revolutionize how contracts are negotiated and enforced in the soccer world.
Historically, players had little wiggle room when it came to terminating their contracts. With the legal backing from the ECJ, players may have more bargaining power over their contracts in the future, potentially leading to shorter, more flexible agreements.
The 1995 ruling in Bosman transformed European soccer by lifting nationality quotas and abolishing transfer fees for players whose contracts had expired. It gave players more control over where they played, effectively allowing them to cross EU borders.
Fast forward to Diarra, in which Lassana Diarra, a former French international, challenged FIFA’s contract termination and transfer rules. Diarra’s challenge arose after his contract with the Lokomotiv Moscow soccer club expired abruptly, and the international soccer governing body’s policies appeared to limit his ability to sign with another club.
The ECJ ruled that FIFA’s regulations were incompatible with EU law, reinforcing the idea that players’ movements can’t be arbitrarily restricted. We now see an extension of the Bosman precedent, this time focusing on how players can challenge contracts even before they expire.
Soccer clubs have long relied on long-term contracts to provide stability and control over their players. But with the potential for increased player mobility, clubs must reconsider their approach to talent retention and recruitment. If players are free to move at their leisure, clubs should develop relationships with athletes.
This shift may encourage clubs to develop more sustainable strategies. Rather than locking players into long contracts or negotiating transfer fees, clubs may prioritize fostering strong team dynamics, providing career development opportunities, and creating an environment in which players want to stay. Shorter-term contracts and greater freedom for players to leave could make the negotiation process between players, agents, and clubs more fluid.
The potential reduction in transfer fees may alter clubs’ financial models, particularly those that rely heavily on selling players to generate revenue. If the emphasis shifts to player autonomy, clubs could begin developing talent through youth academies and strengthening the team from within rather than acquiring established players from other clubs. This could result in a healthier, more sustainable soccer ecosystem in which clubs primarily develop players to their full potential versus seeking external replacements when players leave.
FIFA now has a critical task: reevaluating its regulations to ensure compliance with EU law. The Diarra decision directly challenges FIFA’s authority over contract terminations and transfers—specifically the financial restrictions imposed on players. If FIFA doesn’t amend its regulations, it risks violating EU law, which could have far-reaching consequences for soccer’s global regulatory framework.
One of the most pressing issues for reform is Article 17 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, which governs contract terminations. Changing this regulation to allow more player mobility and lower financial penalties for contract termination will benefit players. But it will pose difficulties for clubs that rely on transfer fees as their primary revenue source.
FIFA’s changes could affect soccer associations around the world, which will most likely be paying close attention to how FIFA responds to this ruling. If changes to the EU transfer market are successful, other countries may face similar legal challenges or calls for reform.
As players gain more control over their careers, agents will likely see an increase in demand for their services, such as helping players manage contracts and transfers between clubs. Agents may play a bigger role in negotiating contract terminations and facilitating smoother transitions for players who change clubs.
Because players will have more flexibility over their employment and fewer financial constraints, the scouting community may see an increase in the number of players available for transfer at any given time. The Diarra ruling’s flexibility may result in a more open market for talent, making a scout’s job more difficult, as they must constantly assess a larger pool of potential players.
Soccer agencies that specialize in player representation will most likely have to adjust their business models because of reduced transfer fees. Agencies may need to expand their service offerings by focusing on contract negotiations, player career management, and advising on the growing importance of personal branding and endorsements.
The case is Diarra v. FIFA, ECJ, C‑650/22, decision 10/4/24.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax, or its owners.
Temitope Onifade is a California-based attorney, licensed FIFA agent, and managing partner of HT Premier Sports.
Write for Us: Author Guidelines
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.
